AR Ramblings

My rant on the demise of the original Montrail Hardrock shoe has been one of the most popular posts I’ve written. I still get an occasional comment to that post over a year later. Since the original post, I’ve done a lot of (ahem) sole searching and have completely changed what I look for in a shoe. Here is a quick update of what has happened since then.

I was fortunate enough to have local über-underground-ultra-runner Adam Hill encourage me to try using a more minimalist shoe. I did a lot of research, tried a few more pairs of “real” trail shoes (Brooks, La Sportiva), but eventually settled on running in a pair of road racing shoes – Brooks Racer ST‘s. It took several months to fully make the transition. My muscles needed to adjust to the lower heel, feet had to toughen up, and adjustments had to be made to my stride, but the result was amazing.

I’ve since done several 24hr+ adventure races, a 24hr rogaine, and run another SCAR traverse using only these road racing shoes, and my feet have never been happier. The only downsides are lack of durability and poor traction in leaves and thick mud. A little shoe goo can extend the durability, but not much can be done about the traction. [well, Adam could customize them, I suppose]

Along the way, I’ve become convinced that modern shoes cause just as many problems as they try, or claim, to solve.

One of the easiest to observe examples is that a lot of people heel strike when running. Why? Because the shoes they wear tend to encourage that behaviour. I would bet that if you take the average heel-striker and make them run barefoot on a hard, flat surface, they would quickly learn and prefer a mid- or forefoot strike instead.

The thick heel cushioning in most shoes reduces the bone-jarring impacts of heel landings and cuts off the natural feedback that would normally discourage a person from running that way. Another modern design characteristic which seems to encourage this bad behaviour is the lifted heel.

I’m not sure why, but all running shoes place the heel higher than the forefoot. So, even if you naturally have your foot in a flat, mid-foot striking position, you will still land heel-first due to the extra thickness under the heel of the shoe. The heel rise is usually less on racing flats, which is a big reason that I prefer them. Switching to a shoe with a lower heel changes how the muscles are used when running, so give yourself plenty of time to adapt. You are likely to have sore calves when making this transition.

Oh, all of that motion-control and stability crap…well, I bet that is only necessary because the shoe is forcing you to land on your heel and it is very hard to keep everything aligned when rolling from heel to toe without some assistance. A better idea is just to land mid-foot and not have to worry quite as much about all of that. As a bonus, your shoes will be a few ounces lighter without it.

I also read an interesting post on Joe Freil’s blog about pronation. It talks about several runners being videotaped and evaluated.  One, an elite level marathoner who had “excessive pronation”, but never had any injuries.  Another was a runner with a “perfect” neutral foot with a “significant history” of injuries. They found that the hips stayed level on the healthy runner, but dropped on the runner with the injuries. It was determined that good core strength was keeping everything aligned on the “pronating” runner, and poor core strength was the cause of injuries in the “neutral” runner. So, next time you go to a speciality store that has you stand barefoot and walk back and forth, and then tells you what kind of runner you are, just be aware that such a shallow level of assessment could be meaningless for you. Video analysis while running on a treadmill is better, but you may just be applying a band-aid (type of shoe) in an attempt to fix a more fundamental running technique/core strength/muscle imbalance issue.

I’ve learned that less shoe is better. At least for me. Fixing deficiencies in technique  and eliminating muscle imbalances has done more for my running than any shoe ever has.

I still remember the agony I experienced after visiting my first “professional” running store. They fit me in big-ass, clunky, motion-control shoes due to my “pronation problem”. My running that year was terrible, but I told myself that I just needed to give my body time to adapt, and the shoes were probably helping overall. That was complete B.S.! Since then, I’ve visited several high-end running stores and physical therapists to be fitted and analysed (including three video analyses). Over the years, my “pronation problem” has miraculously faded away. The last treadmill video analysis at a local running shop even declared me a perfectly neutral runner. How did I go from being a moderate/severe overpronator to perfectly neutral? Well, as I’m sure any good shoe company will tell you, it must have been the shoes!..and that we all should go out and buy another pair of their most expensive models after the next 300 miles!  Hopefully, I shouldn’t have to point out the stratospheric level of sarcasm in that last statement.  There are actually a few reports suggesting that the cheaper, less technologically advanced shoes cause fewer problems than the more expensive models.  I doubt you’ll find the shoe companies advertising that fact, however.

Although I enjoy running in my road flats, I still occasionally wish for a shoe with some trail-specific features.  Inov-8 is a trail shoe manufacturer whose philosophy I can get behind. I recently picked up a pair of Inov-8 295 trail shoes as a grippier, more durable alternative to the road flats. The 295 is the lightest shoe Inov-8 makes with their Endurance last. The lighter models all use their performance last which is too narrow for my foot.  So far, I’ve been pleased with them.  The heel cup doesn’t seem to conform to my foot as good as the Racer ST’s, but the grip is amazing.  Having a bit of toe protection is nice also, for those times when you get a little sloppy and have a high-speed toe to rock collision.

I highly recommend that everyone experiment and do their own research into the potential advantages of  minimalist shoes and barefoot running.  Just be sure to experiment carefully, slowly, and listen to your body along the way.

REQUIRED READING (these links were in the article, but if you missed them, click now and read! And do some Googling for similar articles…there are plenty more out there!)

• The painful truth about trainers: Are running shoes a waste of money?
• Joe Friel: Running and Core Stability

I’ve avoided this topic for a while because I haven’t had any supporting evidence, but today I found several posts on a message board that seem to jive with my thoughts and experiences.

I have been a long time fan of the Montrail Hardrock shoe for adventure racing and technical trail running. They always worked great with my biomechanics, never gave me a blister, drained well, and easily handled whatever terrain I took them through. They were not the lightest shoes, but were very versatile and totally bombproof. I have 4 pairs in the garage right now, and have retired even more than that over the years.

Imagine my surprise after buying a new pair last year and suddenly getting nasty heel blisters and achy knees. I had purchased the exact same model and size as all of my other pairs. The color was different, but everything else looked the same. How could this be happening?! I learned a little later that Montrail had been acquired by Columbia Sportswear. Surely they couldn’t have screwed up such a great shoe so quickly?! Did the manufacturing change? Did QA go straight to hell? I had no idea, but I was definitely not happy. After going through multiple pairs over several years, I could tell something was not right.

Today, I found some postings on www.whiteblaze.net that seem to agree with me. A few quotes/snippets:

Okay, there’s a been multiple threads scattered about WB regarding the problems with the Montrail Hardrock; they were great, but after Montrail got bought out by Columbia, problems came. The light gray has a different fit than the dark gray/yellow model. Less durable too.

…those appear to be the 2006-2007 models (the first batch by Columbia).
THe old Hardrocks are dark grey w/ blue stripes and with a yellow sole (pre-columbia):
http://www.protrek.com.hk/eng/images…ardrock003.jpg
Rumor has it that Columbia is revamping the shoes in 2008, partially because of the complaints from the post-Columbia takeover of Montrail.

having used the bomb proof hardrocks for a number of years, I have had problems with my last 2 pairs of new Columbia sportwear made hard rocks. Old ( montrail made) stock could become like gold dust if Columbia dosn’t get it’s act together. Is anyone out there having the same problems??

So, I’ve recently been on the hunt for some new shoes. I’m hesitant to try out the new ‘08 Hardrocks. I mean, they somehow managed to totally F-up a great shoe without attempting to change it (I assume). If they intentionally change it, what will be the result?

I tried some Brooks Adrenaline ASRs on my SCAR adventure run this past weekend. It seems like a good shoe for easy trails, but after 70 miles of AT running my feet felt as if a black-masked, medieval, dungeon dude had been testing out his new sledge hammer on my soles. I could barely walk for 24 hours afterwards. The Adrenalines didn’t have nearly enough rock protection. Also, the material underneath the sock liner was torn and worn away under my heal after 30 hours of running in wet shoes. There was actually a very noticeable depression in the heel area. I realize that my SCAR run was an extreme test, but come on…damaged after only 110 miles?..that sucks. A couple of other observations: 1) they seem to have great splash protection, but I think it keeps water in as much as keeping it out. 2) No toe bumper protection…ouch!

So, I’m on the lookout for shoes that will hold up on trail ultras, have a moderate amount of pronation control, and will fit a wide foot. If anyone has suggestions, I’m open. I’ve been wondering if putting some nice insoles in a neutral/mild-control shoe would give me enough support. The Sportiva Fireblades look like a badass shoe. The local FootRX has a nice treadmill video analysis that they offer for free when buying shoes, and I think they have the Fireblade. I might have to test out that combo.